Parasite-insecticide interactions: a case study of Nosema ceranae and fipronil synergy on honeybee
So, 03/25/2012 - 11:13 – webmaster
New study in Nature - Scientific Reports finds strong evidence for pesticide + pathogen hypothesis as key explanation for bee disorders.
ABSTRACT: In ecosystems, a variety of biological, chemical and physical stressors may act in combination to induce illness in populations of living organisms. While recent surveys reported that parasite-insecticide interactions can synergistically and negatively affect honeybee survival, the importance of sequence in exposure to stressors has hardly received any attention. In this work, Western honeybees (Apis mellifera) were sequentially or simultaneously infected by the microsporidian parasite Nosema ceranae and chronically exposed to a sublethal dose of the insecticide fipronil, respectively chosen as biological and chemical stressors. Interestingly, every combination tested led to a synergistic effect on honeybee survival, with the most significant impacts when stressors were applied at the emergence of honeybees. Our study presents significant outcomes on beekeeping management but also points out the potential risks incurred by any living organism frequently exposed to both pathogens and insecticides in their habitat.
Conclusion of the study:
In conclusion, our findings showed that honeybees co-exposed to the natural stressor N. ceranae and to an environmental concentration of the insecticide fipronil will undergo a significantly higher mortality compared to the sum of the effects induced by each agent acting alone.
Few studies have been done on such interactions in the honeybee and the resulting data illustrate the difficulty to find out the synergy related mechanisms. The economical and ecological value of honeybees renders our results worrying as the scenario of colonies housing both N. ceranae spores and insecticide residues is realistic. Those results also point out the potential risks incurred by any living organism frequently exposed to both pesticides and pathogens in their environment, no matter the sequence of exposure to those agents. Such multiple stressors interactions, endangering honeybees and potentially other communities, deserve additional attention. Finally, understanding the complexity of cumulative risks is a prerequisite for the implementation of more efficient guidelines in the frame of future chemicals regulation.
Julie Aufauvre, David G. Biron, Cyril Vidau, Regis Fontbonne, Mathieu Roudel, Marie Diogon, Bernard Vigues, Luc P. Belzunces, Frederic Delbac & Nicolas Blot, 2012. Parasite-insecticide interactions: a case study of Nosema ceranae and fipronil synergy on honeybee, Nature - Scientific Reports, 2, 326.
Download full paper:
http://www.nature.com/srep/2012/120322/srep00326/pdf/srep00326.pdf
The Telegraph 22 March 2012 on this study:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/earthnews/9160366/Honeybee-decline-blam...
- Anmelden um Kommentare zu schreiben
Recent
- Insect decline, an emerging global environmental risk
- Reactie op de kritiek van Stichting Agri Facts op bijensterfte.nl
- Global scientific review reveals effective, affordable alternatives to neonicotinoid and fipronil insecticides
- Petitie: Bescherm onze bijen en stem voor een totaalverbod in EU op neonicotinoiden
- Wat weten we eigenlijk over bijensterfte en neonicotinoiden?
- Update of the Worldwide Integrated Assessment (WIA) on systemic insecticides
- Pollinators and Global Food Security: the Need for Holistic Global Stewardship
- Worldwide Integrated Assessment of the Impact of Systemic Pesticides on Biodiversity and Ecosystems
- Present scales of use of neonicotinoid pesticides put pollinator services at risk
- Grootschalig gebruik neonicotinoïden zet bestuiving op het spel
- Weerwoord op kritiek Vijverberg en Blaauboer op UU PLOS ONE studie imidacloprid & insectenrijkdom
- Neonicotinoid pesticides are a huge risk – so ban is welcome says EEA
- Super insecticide imidacloprid has dramatic impact on insect richness in and around water
- Brits Lagerhuis wil unaniem een verbod op neonicotinoiden
- Late lessen uit vroege waarschuwingen: bijensterfte en systemische insecticiden
- Handbestuiving in China en de Zembla uitzending Moord op de Honingbij II - te kort door bocht of storm in glas perensap?
- Partij voor de Dieren wil onmiddellijk verbod op gevaarlijke bestrijdingsmiddelen
- EFSA identifies risks to bees from neonicotinoids
- Honingbank - time is honey
- EPA Faces New Push To Closely Assess Neonicotinoids' Risks To Wildlife
- New Nature study: Combined pesticide exposure severely affects individual- and colony-level traits in bees
- Influence of dinotefuran and clothianidin on a bee colony
- Movement of Soil-Applied Imidacloprid and Thiamethoxam into Nectar and Pollen of Squash (Cucurbita pepo)
- Imidacloprid-Induced Impairment of Mushroom Bodies and Behavior of the Native Stingless Bee Melipona quadrifasciata anthidioides
- Effects of imidacloprid, a neonicotinoid pesticide, on reproduction in worker bumble bees (Bombus terrestris)
Website onder redactie van Milieu en Natuurwetenschappen, Copernicus Instituut voor Duurzame Ontwikkeling, Universiteit Utrecht
Heeft u relevante kennis of ervaring over bijensterfte of tips of links die u via deze website wilt delen, neem dan contact op per e-mail: webmaster[at]bijensterfte.nl
Colofon
Heeft u relevante kennis of ervaring over bijensterfte of tips of links die u via deze website wilt delen, neem dan contact op per e-mail: webmaster[at]bijensterfte.nl
Colofon
Kommentare
Pettis 3-P Hypothesis: Poor nutrition, Pesticides and Pathogens
Dr Jeff Pettis from the US Department of Agriculture was one of the first to put forward the 3-P hypothesis: "We can't just point to any one single factor as being the dominant thing in the decline in honey bee health. Of late, it seems that this has been the dominant issue, that pesticides are driving everything in bee health. "I think there's more of what I call the 3-P principle – poor nutrition, pesticides and pathogens. Those three things are interacting greatly. Nutrition is the foundation of good bee health, and certainly there's some pesticide exposure going on, but it varies widely over time and space. And the pathogens in my opinion are often acting secondarily. But it's the interaction of these three [that matters]. You get three of them lined up and surely you'll have bees in poor health. Even the combination of any two could be problematic."
http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/nature/study-reveals-how-bees-r...
The first who reported such synergistic interactions is Joe Cummins in 2007: Nosema and Neonicotinoid Pesticides Act Synergistically to Kill Honeybees
Other studies that confirmed that bees exposed to pesticides are more prone to diseases (that is: there is a synergistic effect of pesticides and pathogens):
The Canedian researcher Dr. Madeleine Chagnon reported in 2009 that bees exposed to clothianidin became more prone to Chronic Bee Paralysis Virus: High mortality of bees showing symptoms of the Chronic Bee Paralysis Virus was observed in exposed hives while control hives remained healthy, see: Impacts of pesticides used in Quebec (Canada) corn fields on honeybee colonies.
There is also a hypothesis that the known adverse effect of neonicotinoid pesticides on grooming and alloo grooming in insects explains why varroa hits harder since the large scale introduction of neonicotinoid pesticides around 2004 (Between 1992 and 2004 neonicotinoids were used small scale. Further accellerated by the EPA ban on diazinon in 2005 they became the most widely used and fastest growing class of insecticides world wide with a present-day global market share of more than 25%.)
http://www.bijensterfte.nl/en/node/447